captain pantoja and the special service

Captain Pantoja and the Special Service was written by Mario Vargas Llosa in 1973. I decided to read this novel because I'd heard of the author before, namely about the book "The Time of the Hero." I really wanted to like this book, but truthfully I was in two minds about it. Depending on factors such as whether I was fresh out of class about colonialism or social dynamics, how tired I was, or my mood, my opinion about it shifted. I can completely see why it would be funny for people, and I found it funny too when I was reading it in a more lighthearted state. But I also sometimes couldn't ignore the misogyny of it all, so I sometimes found it harder to enjoy. That said, I think it is a well-written piece of satire that makes good use of euphemism and absurdity to illustrate comedy, so I wasn't dwelling on the unsavoury tones of the book for too long.

I suppose Captain Pantaleon Pantoja's role in the book could be summarised by the phrase "one thing led to another" because the poor guy didn't even want the responsibility of bringing together such a task force. He mentioned it being against his principles, but one thing led to another and lo and behold he ends up cheating on his wife. I suppose this snowball effect is just a trope that Vargas Llosa employed for the sake of plot progression, and it worked!

The whole concept of employing a bunch of prostitutes to satisfy the soldiers' sexual needs is kinda wild - not that it hasn't been done before in real life, because of course it has - but the regimented nature of the operation is what makes the novel a comedy rather than a tragedy. Anyway, I enjoyed the contrast between the "professional" behaviour and language used around what is typically crude humour. I also liked how the prostitutes were referred to as specialists rather than more demeaning language. However, wish all the dimensions of "visitadora" could be translated over into the English term because I think that nuance in the term is just brilliant.

I won't go too deep into the writing style of it all, but the multiple perspectives and the raw, unfiltered narration was one of my favourite aspects of this novel that made it feel like I was reading a diary or listening to a friend vent. 

My question for you all; how much do you think Pantaleon Pantoja was actually influenced by the aphrodisiacal Amazon? Was he just letting his inner self show?

Comments

  1. Daniel OrizagaMarch 13, 2023 at 11:57 PM

    "I enjoyed the contrast between the "professional" behavior and language used around what is typically crude humour." One of the ways of creating comic effects is precisely this mechanism, of making contrasts so crazy that they are surprising, and from that surprise comes a comic effect. However, I agree with you. Misogyny is not something to be laughed at.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AlizeyMarch 15, 2023 at 10:37 AM

    Hi Deeba! Great blog post, you definitely brought up some interesting thoughts. Let me start off by saying I found it really cool how your perception of the book shifted, depending on your mood. I feel like whenever that happens to me when reading is because the book has left an "imprint" on me, in some way. Anyways, to answer your question, my answer is I don't know. I'm trying really hard to come up with an answer, but I really don't know. In a way Pantoja could have been influenced by his environment and his role in the service, but on the other hand if he could give up his principles so quickly, did he ever really care of them?? For me, it feels like there isn't just one answer.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the next 50 years of solitude

Finishing this book was like a whirlwind (though not as dramatic as the literal whirlwind at the end of the story of course.) I still find it an impressive feat that Garcia Marquez managed to fit 7 generations in a single novel without it being a Tolstoy-length monstrosity. This half of the story was a bit easier to wrap my head around, having got through the first half. However, a lot of my initial thoughts carried through. In my last blog post, I mentioned nominative determinism being the idea that your name somewhat dictates your character, and I could definitely see that in Aureliano and Amaranta Ursula's son - the one who was born with a pig's tail. They briefly considered giving him a name that hadn't been used before in the family, but decided against it, calling him Aureliano all over again and oh look he's got a tail and the family curse prevails. If they could "simply" untether themselves from the family curse and the seemingly neverending cycles the...
Read more

i got stuck in the labyrinth

 Truth be told, this was not the book for me. I disliked this one as much as I enjoyed the previous one. I definitely see the playful aspect of the book, and I can see why other people have enjoyed it - having read some of the blogs that are already up - but I think this style of play just isn't very compatible with my reading. The title of the book definitely makes sense to me though; reading it felt like going round and round a maze, momentarily feeling like I understand what's going on before turning the corner and seeing that I was going in the wrong direction the whole time. Perhaps if I were to read some of the stories a second time I would be able to better digest the themes and the happenings, but for the most part I felt like I was trying to grasp at straws to understand what was being said. All that aside, the two stories that were marginally easier for me to follow were Funes the Memorious and The Shape of the Sword. Perhaps it was to do with my mindset at the time o...
Read more

I, Rigoberta Menchu

 I, Rigoberta Menchu is probably one of my favourites of the term so far. I believe it's the first (and only?) non-fictional text of the term - although this is partially debated a la Jon's lecture - because it's not a novel, but a testimonial about life as an Indigenous K'iche' Maya woman and her family in Guatemala during the civil war. The subject matter of this book was not completely foreign to me; having read and studied some of the impacts of colonialism and its impacts on Indigenous people, past and present, I think I came in to reading the story with a fairly good sense of what to expect. That said, I'd never read anything specifically about the case in Guatemala, so there was definitely much to be learned there. I can't say that I was completely surprised by what I read in the book, because I was already primed to expect absolutely horrible brutality. Nonetheless, I found the reading experience tough and sometimes found myself skimming over the mos...
Read more